D-I-TASSER Q9NPC8-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q9NPC8-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9NPC8 (130 residues)
MSMLPTFGFTQEQVACVCEVLQQGGNIERLGRFLWSLPACEHLHKNESVLKAKAVVAFHR
GNFRELYKILESHQFSPHNHAKLQQLWLKAHYIEAEKLRGRPLGAVGKYRVRRKFPLPRS
IWDGEETSYC

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| MSMLPTFGFTQEQVACVCEVLQQGGNIERLGRFLWSLPACEHLHKNESVLKAKAVVAFHRGNFRELYKILESHQFSPHNHAKLQQLWLKAHYIEAEKLRGRPLGAVGKYRVRRKFPLPRSIWDGEETSYC
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSCC
Confidence	9998888989999999999984147889999999827984554326699999999999957799999999909999131799999999999999999849999975330132059999876798775049
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| MSMLPTFGFTQEQVACVCEVLQQGGNIERLGRFLWSLPACEHLHKNESVLKAKAVVAFHRGNFRELYKILESHQFSPHNHAKLQQLWLKAHYIEAEKLRGRPLGAVGKYRVRRKFPLPRSIWDGEETSYC
Prediction	7644444513461032104203657426301400140243641463120020201010335314300400463504673254014003412144156446553443542414463431531154754437
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSCC
MSMLPTFGFTQEQVACVCEVLQQGGNIERLGRFLWSLPACEHLHKNESVLKAKAVVAFHRGNFRELYKILESHQFSPHNHAKLQQLWLKAHYIEAEKLRGRPLGAVGKYRVRRKFPLPRSIWDGEETSYC

4d10B

0.09

0.08

2.92

1.00

DEthreader

------CQQLLEIYALEIQMYTAQKNNKKLKALYEQSLHIKIPHPIGVIRECGGKMHLREGEFEKAHTDFFEKNYSSPRRTTCLKYLVLANMLMK--S-----------GI--NPFDAKPYKNDILTNLI

4egcA

0.96

0.86

24.16

1.12

CNFpred

MSMLPSFGFTQEQVACVCEVLQQGGNLERLGRFLWSLPA------NESVLKAKAVVAFHRGNFRELYKILESHQFSPHNHPKLQQLWLKAHYVEAEKLRGRPLGAVGKYRVRRKFPLPRTIWD-------

3msvA

0.04

1.92

1.00

DEthreader

---------E-EDNISQLWGLYEMSLVFGTIHEADRIRNTIST-LPKDFHAAYSSALLAVEYIDAAIERAQLGLANESRFLALARAYLEKVRVLVWRHDNE----PV-TQLVNPYEKAIQYLRPALILSS

5cd6A2

0.15

0.13

4.38

0.74

SPARKS-K

IPETSWLNLHPQLVIERDKVLKKFGALPEREKWLDKINA----SSDEWVVERKVQLLIDKKQYQEAKDLLLSTHFQKVTYT-RTGLWEQINEGL-----GLSPQPVPEQLGEDRLARFEYE---------

6sn9D

0.08

3.05

0.66

MapAlign

----EVPDNPPNEIYATAQQKLQDGNWRQAITQLEALDNRYPGPYSQQVQLDLIYAYYKNADLPLAQAAIDRFLNPTHNIDYVMYMRGLTNMALDQGFFGVDRDPQHARAAFSDFSKLVRGYPNSQYTTD

5lynA

0.08

3.02

0.44

CEthreader

-GSMAETKAKAEDLKMQGNKAMANKDYELAINKYTEAIKVL--PTNAIYYANRAAAHSSLKEYDQAVKDAESAISIDPSYFRGYSRLGFAKYAQGKPEE----ALEAYKKVLDIEGDNATEAMKRDYESA

4ui9X

0.14

0.13

4.45

0.52

MUSTER

NPELFSPPQKYQLLVYHADSLFHDKEYRNAVSKYTMALQQKKALSEIEVKYKLAECYTVLKQDKDAIAILDGRQRTPKINMMLANLYKKAQERPSVTSY----------EVLRQCPLALDAILGLLSLSV

5cd6A2

0.16

0.14

4.58

0.50

HHsearch

AIPTSWLNLHPQLVIERDKVLKKFGTLPEREKWLDKINA----SSDEWVVERKVQLLIDKKQYQEAKDLLLSTHFQKVHQYTRTGLWEQIN-----EGLGLS-----------PQPVPEQLGEDRLARFE

5gmkd2

0.09

0.07

2.65

0.68

FFAS-3D

---------GVNAWNSFVDFEIRQKNWNGVREIYS---KYVMAHPQMQTWLKWVRFENRHGNTEFTRSVYSLAIDQIWSDMEVAKLVNS--FAHWEAAQQEYERSSALYIAIEKWP--------------

4d10A

0.07

2.79

0.58

EigenThreader

RDYCTSAKHVINMCLNVIKVSVYLQNWSHVLSYVSKAESTPEIAELTKLKCAAGLAELAARKYKQAAKCL--LLASFDHPSNVAIYGGLCALATF--------DRQELQRNVISSSSFKLFLELEPQVRD

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7491

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4d10B2	0.64	2.99	0.083	0.831	model1_4d10B2.pdb.gz
2	5l4kS	0.64	3.59	0.043	0.862	model1_5l4kS.pdb.gz
3	3msvA	0.63	3.28	0.039	0.877	model1_3msvA.pdb.gz
4	5lx8A	0.63	3.79	0.032	0.939	model1_5lx8A.pdb.gz
5	6fec2	0.63	3.52	0.080	0.900	model1_6fec2.pdb.gz
6	6e60A	0.63	3.73	0.057	0.908	model1_6e60A.pdb.gz
7	5mpbS2	0.62	3.25	0.055	0.839	model1_5mpbS2.pdb.gz
8	4lctA	0.62	3.10	0.042	0.839	model1_4lctA.pdb.gz
9	3t5vB	0.62	3.35	0.045	0.846	model1_3t5vB.pdb.gz
10	3iv0A	0.62	3.57	0.067	0.885	model1_3iv0A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003700	0.83	transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:1901363	0.70	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.70	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.68	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003677	0.67	DNA binding
GO:0043565	0.60	sequence-specific DNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.94	single-organism process
GO:0032502	0.91	developmental process
GO:0044767	0.90	single-organism developmental process
GO:0048856	0.87	anatomical structure development
GO:0065007	0.82	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.81	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.80	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009987	0.80	cellular process
GO:0048513	0.78	animal organ development
GO:0044763	0.74	single-organism cellular process
GO:0009653	0.71	anatomical structure morphogenesis
GO:0080090	0.68	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.68	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0048869	0.68	cellular developmental process
GO:0031323	0.68	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0051171	0.67	regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0006355	0.66	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0048523	0.58	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0048518	0.57	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0048522	0.56	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0030154	0.56	cell differentiation
GO:2000026	0.54	regulation of multicellular organismal development
GO:0048598	0.53	embryonic morphogenesis
GO:0031325	0.52	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0016477	0.52	cell migration
GO:0010604	0.52	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0032501	0.51	multicellular organismal process
GO:0045935	0.50	positive regulation of nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0045595	0.50	regulation of cell differentiation
GO:0009887	0.50	organ morphogenesis

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043231	0.97	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.95	nucleus
GO:0032991	0.59	macromolecular complex
GO:0043234	0.57	protein complex
GO:0005667	0.55	transcription factor complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3dpyA	0.517	3.37	0.058	0.731	2.5.1.58 2.5.1.59	69
2	0.060	1ihgA	0.530	3.11	0.111	0.715	5.2.1.8	NA
3	0.060	2if4A	0.534	3.47	0.067	0.777	5.2.1.8	NA
4	0.060	1a17A	0.555	3.63	0.045	0.823	3.1.3.16	109
5	0.060	2jg0A	0.518	4.24	0.075	0.862	3.2.1.28	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.02	3ck9A	0.603	3.73	0.128	0.885	0.15	GLC	complex1.pdb.gz	98,100,112,114
2	0.02	3ck7D	0.585	3.74	0.120	0.900	0.12	ACX	complex2.pdb.gz	101,103,105
3	0.01	3pdnA	0.583	3.74	0.099	0.854	0.18	SFG	complex3.pdb.gz	92,93,101,102,103,104,105,109
4	0.01	3mekA	0.592	3.63	0.099	0.854	0.13	SAM	complex4.pdb.gz	93,100,104,109
5	0.01	3bqoA	0.574	3.74	0.093	0.869	0.19	III	complex5.pdb.gz	67,70,71,84,87,88
6	0.01	2c1jA	0.568	3.72	0.086	0.854	0.20	III	complex6.pdb.gz	88,89,124,125
7	0.01	3gz1B	0.599	3.55	0.080	0.846	0.13	III	complex7.pdb.gz	95,107,110,113
8	0.01	2fi70	0.576	3.35	0.071	0.815	0.20	III	complex8.pdb.gz	91,92,112,124,127
9	0.01	3buaC	0.573	3.98	0.068	0.885	0.23	III	complex9.pdb.gz	67,68,70,71,77,80,81,83,84,87
10	0.01	2f420	0.209	5.25	0.058	0.408	0.18	III	complex10.pdb.gz	86,90,91,94,97,109

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.