D-I-TASSER Q9NR63-D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q9NR63-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9NR63 (181 residues)
PRSTRMLLGPNTVSNSIGDIHRNKRKVFSKIFSHEALESYLPKIQLVIQDTLRAWSSHPE
AINVYQEAQKLTFRMAIRVLLGFSIPEEDLGHLFEVYQQFVDNVFSLPVDLPFSGYRRGI
QARQILQKGLEKAIREKLQCTQGKDYLDALDLLIESSKEHGKEMTMQELKDGTLELIFAA
Y

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| PRSTRMLLGPNTVSNSIGDIHRNKRKVFSKIFSHEALESYLPKIQLVIQDTLRAWSSHPEAINVYQEAQKLTFRMAIRVLLGFSIPEEDLGHLFEVYQQFVDNVFSLPVDLPFSGYRRGIQARQILQKGLEKAIREKLQCTQGKDYLDALDLLIESSKEHGKEMTMQELKDGTLELIFAAY
Prediction	CCHHHHHHCCCCCSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCC
Confidence	9426875289951116909999999987640288999999999999999999986228955648999999999999999947999879999999999999998754775799812489999999999999999999998257899998999998556889999999999999999985569
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| PRSTRMLLGPNTVSNSIGDIHRNKRKVFSKIFSHEALESYLPKIQLVIQDTLRAWSSHPEAINVYQEAQKLTFRMAIRVLLGFSIPEEDLGHLFEVYQQFVDNVFSLPVDLPFSGYRRGIQARQILQKGLEKAIREKLQCTQGKDYLDALDLLIESSKEHGKEMTMQELKDGTLELIFAAY
Prediction	6721351035500031326403421404330333633553152125004510650474743040252034200300030242352646215402510340041022332312123323023005303610450055137557886330002120403277455033630142033332347
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCHHHHHHCCCCCSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCC
PRSTRMLLGPNTVSNSIGDIHRNKRKVFSKIFSHEALESYLPKIQLVIQDTLRAWSSHPEAINVYQEAQKLTFRMAIRVLLGFSIPEEDLGHLFEVYQQFVDNVFSLPVDLPFSGYRRGIQARQILQKGLEKAIREKLQCTQGKDYLDALDLLIESSKEHGKEMTMQELKDGTLELIFAAY

2vn0A

0.08

3.24

1.50

DEthreader

SPISQRITKGLGIISSNGKRWKEIRRFSLTTLRNFGMRSIEDRVQEEAHCLVEELRKTASPCDPTFILGCAPCNVICSVVFQKRFDDQNFLTLMKRFNENFRILNSICPLIDPGTHNKVLKNVALTRSYIREKVKEHQASLDVNNPRDFIDCFLIKMEQENSEFNIENLVGTVADLFVAGT

2zqxA1

0.14

4.69

1.23

SPARKS-K

PKRVQKLFGVNAIQGMDGSAHIHRKMLFLSLMTPPHQKRLAELMTEEWKAAVTRWEKADE-VVLFEEAKEILCRVACYWAG-VPLKETEVKERADDFIDMVD-----AFGAVGPRHWKGRRARPRAEEWIEVMIEDARAGLLKTTSGTALHEMAFHTQEDGSQLDSRMAAIELINVLRPIV

6fyjA

0.15

0.14

4.68

0.68

MapAlign

--RVVQTFGKNGVQALDGQTHKHRKEMFMSIMSPDELEKLTDITKKQWEIAVDKWE-QMDKVILYEEAKEIMCRTACQWAGVP-VQENEVKRLTKNLGAMFESA-----AAVGLKHWLGRHARNYEEIWIEELIDRVRDGKVNPPENTTLHKFSWYRDLEGNLLDTETAAVEVINILRPIV

6fyjA1

0.16

0.15

4.99

0.49

CEthreader

NRVVQTLFGKNGVQALDGQTHKHRKEMFMSIMSPDELEKLTDITKKQWEIAVDKWEQMD-KVILYEEAKEIMCRTACQWAGVP-VQENEVKRLTKNLGAMFESAAAV-----GLKHWLGRHARNYEEIWIEELIDRVRDGKVNPPENTTLHKFSWYRDLEGNLLDTETAAVEVINILRPIV

2ve3A2

0.33

0.32

9.62

1.18

MUSTER

PLSTRILLGPNALATQMGEIHRSRRKILYQAFLPRTLDSYLPKMDGIVQGYLEQWGKAN-EVIWYPQLRRMTFDVAATLFMGEK--VSQNPQLFPWFETYIQGLFSLPIPLPNTLFGKSQRARALLLAELEKIIKARQQQ--PPSEEDALGILLAARDDNNQPLSLPELKDQILLLLFAGH

2ve3A2

0.33

0.32

9.62

1.15

HHsearch

PLSTRILLGPNALATQMGEIHRSRRKILYQAFLPRTLDSYLPKMDGIVQGYLEQWGKA-NEVIWYPQLRRMTFDVAATLFMGEKVSQ--NPQLFPWFETYIQGLFSLPIPLPNTLFGKSQRARALLLAELEKIIKARQQQ--PPSEEDALGILLAARDDNNQPLSLPELKDQILLLLFAGH

4uylA1

0.18

5.76

2.24

FFAS-3D

---TTPVFGRHVVYDCPNAKLMEQKKFVKYGLTSDALRSYVPLITDEVESFVKNSPGHKGVFDVCKTIAEITIYTASRSLQGKEVRSKFFAELYHNLDMGFAPINFMLPWAPLPHNRKRDAAQRKLTETYMEIIKARRQAGSKKDSEDMVWNLMSCVYKNGTPVPDEEIAHMMIALLMAGQ

2vn0A1

0.09

3.37

1.13

EigenThreader

SPISQRITKGLGIISSNGKRWKEIRRFSLTTLRNFGIEDRVQEEAHCLVEELRKT--KASPCDPTFILGCAPCNVICSVVFQKRFDYKNFLTLMKRFNENFRILNSPWIQVCNNFHNKVLKNVALTRSYIREKVKEHQASLDVNNPRDFIDCFLIKMEQEKSEFNIENLVGTVADLFVAG-

2ve3A

0.33

0.32

9.62

1.17

CNFpred

PLSTRILLGPNALATQMGEIHRSRRKILYQAFLPRTLDSYLPKMDGIVQGYLEQWGKA-NEVIWYPQLRRMTFDVAATLFMGEKVS--QNPQLFPWFETYIQGLFSLPIPLPNTLFGKSQRARALLLAELEKIIKARQQQP--PSEEDALGILLAARDDNNQPLSLPELKDQILLLLFAGH

2vn0A1

0.08

3.23

1.50

DEthreader

SPISQRITKGLGIISSNGKRWKEIRRFSLTTLRNFGMRSIEDRVQEEAHCLVEELRKTASPCDPTFILGCAPCNVICSVVFQKRFDDQNFLTLMKRFNENFRILNSICPLIDPGTHNKVLKNVALTRSYIREKVKEHQASLDVNNPRDFIDCFLIKMEQENSEFNIENLVGTVADLFVAG-

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8468

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2ve3A2	0.89	1.87	0.314	0.967	model1_2ve3A2.pdb.gz
2	2vn0A	0.88	2.18	0.083	1.000	model1_2vn0A.pdb.gz
3	2pg6A1	0.88	2.18	0.122	1.000	model1_2pg6A1.pdb.gz
4	6a15A	0.87	1.70	0.237	0.956	model1_6a15A.pdb.gz
5	5ylwA2	0.87	2.21	0.138	1.000	model1_5ylwA2.pdb.gz
6	5t6qA	0.86	2.08	0.147	0.978	model1_5t6qA.pdb.gz
7	3rukA	0.86	2.38	0.106	0.989	model1_3rukA.pdb.gz
8	3e6iA	0.86	2.29	0.122	0.995	model1_3e6iA.pdb.gz
9	6l8hA	0.85	2.23	0.119	0.972	model1_6l8hA.pdb.gz
10	2q9fA	0.85	2.27	0.096	0.978	model1_2q9fA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016491	1.00	oxidoreductase activity
GO:0004497	0.97	monooxygenase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0006629	1.00	lipid metabolic process
GO:0065007	0.94	biological regulation
GO:0042445	0.93	hormone metabolic process
GO:0032502	0.89	developmental process
GO:1901360	0.88	organic cyclic compound metabolic process
GO:0044767	0.88	single-organism developmental process
GO:0008202	0.87	steroid metabolic process
GO:0016125	0.86	sterol metabolic process
GO:0009058	0.86	biosynthetic process
GO:1901362	0.85	organic cyclic compound biosynthetic process
GO:0008610	0.85	lipid biosynthetic process
GO:1901617	0.84	organic hydroxy compound biosynthetic process
GO:0048856	0.84	anatomical structure development
GO:0044707	0.84	single-multicellular organism process
GO:0006694	0.84	steroid biosynthetic process
GO:0048878	0.81	chemical homeostasis
GO:0016129	0.81	phytosteroid biosynthetic process
GO:0016132	0.80	brassinosteroid biosynthetic process
GO:0010268	0.80	brassinosteroid homeostasis
GO:0007275	0.78	multicellular organism development
GO:0009987	0.56	cellular process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.98	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.92	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043229	0.80	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.80	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.79	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005783	0.71	endoplasmic reticulum
GO:0016020	0.54	membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3k9vA	0.811	2.62	0.170	0.972	1.14.13.-	NA
2	0.060	1og5B	0.858	2.40	0.083	1.000	1.14.13.48 1.14.13.49 1.14.13.80	NA
3	0.060	1cptA	0.741	2.73	0.117	0.895	1.14.-.-	175
4	0.060	3gw9A	0.786	3.15	0.166	1.000	1.14.13.70	21
5	0.060	1n40A	0.724	2.92	0.099	0.895	1.14.-.-	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.30	2ve3B	0.885	1.77	0.320	0.950	0.64	HEM	complex1.pdb.gz	13,14,21,25,32,80,175,179
2	0.20	3ebsA	0.876	2.16	0.133	1.000	0.50	N4E	complex2.pdb.gz	4,172,176
3	0.19	3ebsD	0.876	2.16	0.133	1.000	0.46	N4E	complex3.pdb.gz	4,175,178,179
4	0.12	1r9oA	0.849	2.72	0.083	0.995	0.59	FLP	complex4.pdb.gz	14,100,101,104,123,126,174,175,178,179
5	0.04	2p85C	0.879	2.13	0.133	1.000	0.63	IND	complex5.pdb.gz	173,176,177

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.