D-I-TASSER Q9NXD2-D3

D-I-TASSER results for Q9NXD2-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9NXD2 (144 residues)
SLADQDLKIFSHSFVGRRMPLWCWSHSNGSALVRMALIKDVLQQRKIDQRICNAITKSHP
QRSDVYKSDLDKTLPNIQEVQAAFVKLKQLCVNEPFEETEEKWLSSLENTRWLEYVRAFL
KHSAELVYMLESKHLSVVLQEEEG

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| SLADQDLKIFSHSFVGRRMPLWCWSHSNGSALVRMALIKDVLQQRKIDQRICNAITKSHPQRSDVYKSDLDKTLPNIQEVQAAFVKLKQLCVNEPFEETEEKWLSSLENTRWLEYVRAFLKHSAELVYMLESKHLSVVLQEEEG
Prediction	CCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSCCCC
Confidence	989999999999972898569999839994798707999864458999999999998487778845752678887789999999999999834788766148999857537399999999999999999997898299945899
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| SLADQDLKIFSHSFVGRRMPLWCWSHSNGSALVRMALIKDVLQQRKIDQRICNAITKSHPQRSDVYKSDLDKTLPNIQEVQAAFVKLKQLCVNEPFEETEEKWLSSLENTRWLEYVRAFLKHSAELVYMLESKHLSVVLQEEEG
Prediction	825373044005212731000000315441000001223544744530440042026224744411113335515304303501420251034443644454024204624015103300500030042036772200001578
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSCCCC
SLADQDLKIFSHSFVGRRMPLWCWSHSNGSALVRMALIKDVLQQRKIDQRICNAITKSHPQRSDVYKSDLDKTLPNIQEVQAAFVKLKQLCVNEPFEETEEKWLSSLENTRWLEYVRAFLKHSAELVYMLESKHLSVVLQEEEG

2yf0A3

0.16

5.30

1.17

DEthreader

ASK-PIIVGSSKFRSKGRFPVLSYYHDKEAAICRCSQPLSGSARCLEDEHLLQAISK-ANPVNRYMYVMDTRPKLNAIENIHVMRSSLQKLLENGTKGLSVDFYSGLESSGWLRHIKAVMDAAVFLAKAITVENASVLVHCSDG

2yf0A

0.19

6.05

1.68

SPARKS-K

IASKPIIVGSSKFRSKGRFPVLSYYHQKEAAICRCSQPLSGFARCLEDEHLLQAISKANPVNRYMYVMDTFVGIENIHVMRSSLQKLLEVNGTK--GLSVNDFYSGLESSGWLRHIKAVMDAAVFLAKAITVENASVLVHCSDG

4y7iA

0.22

6.80

1.66

MapAlign

SVTLGTVVGSSKFRSKERVPVLSYLYENNAAICRCSQPLSGFYTRVDDELLLEAISQTNPGSQFMYVVDTRMGIENIHVMRSSLQKLLEVC--ELKTPTMSEFLSGLESSGWLRHIKAIMDAGIFITKAVKVEKASVLVHSSDG

4y7iA

0.20

0.19

6.24

1.57

CEthreader

SVTLGTVVGSSKFRSKERVPVLSYLYKNNAAICRCSQPLSGFTRCVDDELLLEAISQTNPGSQFMYVVDTRMGIENIHVMRSSLQKLLEVCELKTPTMS--EFLSGLESSGWLRHIKAIMDAGIFITKAVKVEKASVLVHSSDG

2yf0A3

0.20

0.19

6.24

1.62

MUSTER

IASKPIIVGSSKFRSKGRFPVLSYYHQKEAAICRCSQPLSGFSARLEDEHLLQAISKANPVNRYMYVMDTRVGIENIHVMRSSLQKLLEVNGTKG--LSVNDFYSGLESSGWLRHIKAVMDAAVFLAKAITVENASVLVHCSDG

2yf0A3

0.20

0.19

6.24

4.34

HHsearch

IASKPIIVGSSKFRSKGRFPVLSYYHQKEAAICRCSQPLSGFSARLEDEHLLQAISKANPVNRYMYVMDTRVGIENIHVMRSSLQKLLEVNGTK--GLSVNDFYSGLESSGWLRHIKAVMDAAVFLAKAITVENASVLVHCSDG

2yf0A3

0.20

0.19

6.24

1.86

FFAS-3D

IASKPIIVGSSKFRSKGRFPVLSYYHQDKAAICRCSQPLSGFSARLEDEHLLQAISKANPVNRYMYVMDTFVGIENIHVMRSSLQKLLEVNGTKG--LSVNDFYSGLESSGWLRHIKAVMDAAVFLAKAITVENASVLVHCSDG

1zvrA

0.26

7.92

1.45

EigenThreader

NIPDEELKRVASFRSRGRIPVLSWIHESQATITRCSQPMVGGKRSKEDEKYLQAIMDSNAQSHKIFIFDARPDIHNIHVMRESLRKLKEIVYPNIE---ETHWLSNLESTHWLEHIKLILAGALRIADKVESGKTSVVVHSSDG

1lw3A

0.26

7.91

1.27

CNFpred

NIPDEELKRVASFRSRGRIPVLSWIHPEQATITRCSQPMVGV-RSKEDEKYLQAIMDSNAQSHKIFIFDARLDIHNIHVMRESLRKLKEIVYPNI---EETHWLSNLESTHWLEHIKLILAGALRIADKVESGKTSVVVHSSDG

2yf0A

0.16

5.30

1.17

DEthreader

ASK-PIIVGSSKFRSKGRFPVLSYYHDKEAAICRCSQPLSGSARCLEDEHLLQAISK-ANPVNRYMYVMDTRPKLNAIENIHVMRSSLQKLLENGTKGLSVDFYSGLESSGWLRHIKAVMDAAVFLAKAITVENASVLVHCSDG

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8159

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4y7iA	0.95	0.90	0.204	0.986	model1_4y7iA.pdb.gz
2	2yf0A	0.94	1.15	0.190	0.986	model1_2yf0A.pdb.gz
3	1zvrA2	0.92	1.18	0.270	0.979	model1_1zvrA2.pdb.gz
4	2pa5A	0.49	3.64	0.039	0.694	model1_2pa5A.pdb.gz
5	5j8rA	0.46	3.71	0.078	0.688	model1_5j8rA.pdb.gz
6	2hxpA	0.45	2.37	0.105	0.528	model1_2hxpA.pdb.gz
7	3f81A	0.44	3.11	0.096	0.556	model1_3f81A.pdb.gz
8	2gzmA	0.39	4.73	0.038	0.667	model1_2gzmA.pdb.gz
9	2q8xA	0.39	5.24	0.047	0.681	model1_2q8xA.pdb.gz
10	3sdeA2	0.35	5.47	0.024	0.681	model1_3sdeA2.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016788	0.96	hydrolase activity, acting on ester bonds
GO:0016791	0.95	phosphatase activity
GO:0052866	0.90	phosphatidylinositol phosphate phosphatase activity
GO:0004438	0.89	phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphatase activity
GO:0004721	0.77	phosphoprotein phosphatase activity
GO:0004725	0.70	protein tyrosine phosphatase activity
GO:0034593	0.69	phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate phosphatase activity
GO:0052629	0.68	phosphatidylinositol-3,5-bisphosphate 3-phosphatase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.97	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.96	single-organism process
GO:0044763	0.93	single-organism cellular process
GO:0008152	0.92	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.91	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.91	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.91	cellular metabolic process
GO:0006796	0.89	phosphate-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0016311	0.86	dephosphorylation
GO:0044710	0.85	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0044255	0.83	cellular lipid metabolic process
GO:0046488	0.82	phosphatidylinositol metabolic process
GO:0046856	0.78	phosphatidylinositol dephosphorylation
GO:0044260	0.72	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0019538	0.71	protein metabolic process
GO:0065007	0.70	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.70	regulation of biological process
GO:0006464	0.70	cellular protein modification process
GO:0050794	0.69	regulation of cellular process
GO:0006470	0.68	protein dephosphorylation
GO:0035335	0.56	peptidyl-tyrosine dephosphorylation
GO:0016043	0.56	cellular component organization
GO:0051234	0.53	establishment of localization
GO:0032502	0.52	developmental process
GO:0006810	0.52	transport
GO:1901576	0.51	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0044767	0.51	single-organism developmental process
GO:0044711	0.51	single-organism biosynthetic process
GO:0044249	0.51	cellular biosynthetic process
GO:0051128	0.50	regulation of cellular component organization
GO:0046474	0.50	glycerophospholipid biosynthetic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0005737	0.87	cytoplasm
GO:0044444	0.78	cytoplasmic part
GO:0016020	0.78	membrane
GO:0043226	0.65	organelle
GO:0044422	0.61	organelle part
GO:0005829	0.61	cytosol
GO:0044446	0.60	intracellular organelle part
GO:0043229	0.60	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.59	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005886	0.58	plasma membrane
GO:0043231	0.55	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1gz7C	0.380	5.52	0.014	0.736	3.1.1.3	NA
2	0.060	2fh7A	0.397	5.05	0.038	0.715	3.1.3.48	NA
3	0.060	1larA	0.495	3.54	0.087	0.694	3.1.3.48	NA
4	0.060	1f6wA	0.516	4.72	0.035	0.896	3.1.1.13 3.1.1.3	NA
5	0.060	1o0sA	0.488	4.74	0.075	0.826	1.1.1.38	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	1ywfA	0.514	3.40	0.092	0.660	0.24	PO4	complex1.pdb.gz	23,25,26
2	0.01	2oz5A	0.500	3.65	0.083	0.653	0.11	7XY	complex2.pdb.gz	76,78,79
3	0.01	1gz3C	0.492	4.85	0.083	0.819	0.17	ATP	complex3.pdb.gz	53,137,138,139,140
4	0.01	1do8B	0.339	5.50	0.068	0.653	0.11	NAD	complex4.pdb.gz	39,141,142
5	0.01	2oz5B	0.496	3.45	0.087	0.639	0.12	7XY	complex5.pdb.gz	47,51,55
6	0.01	1do8A	0.482	4.67	0.083	0.819	0.12	NAD	complex6.pdb.gz	19,55,67,68,69,70,123
7	0.01	1gz3B	0.492	4.72	0.083	0.812	0.12	ATP	complex7.pdb.gz	13,49,138
8	0.01	1gz3A	0.491	4.79	0.083	0.812	0.14	ATP	complex8.pdb.gz	51,52,138

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.