D-I-TASSER Q9P1Z0-D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q9P1Z0-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9P1Z0 (64 residues)
LGEGGDAWVPPTPAPMATSQPEEDSFGPGPRPAGEWEGDRAEAQAPDLQCSLPRRPLPCP
QCGK

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| LGEGGDAWVPPTPAPMATSQPEEDSFGPGPRPAGEWEGDRAEAQAPDLQCSLPRRPLPCPQCGK
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9888865568999888888876567788989888744776644577777888889888887889
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| LGEGGDAWVPPTPAPMATSQPEEDSFGPGPRPAGEWEGDRAEAQAPDLQCSLPRRPLPCPQCGK
Prediction	8575454233434453455636565244444455616466464544746452464424146368
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60

                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
LGEGGDAWVPPTPAPMATSQPEEDSFGPGPRPAGEWEGDRAEAQAPDLQCSLPRRPLPCPQCGK

6vyvE2

0.20

6.48

0.57

CEthreader

GVELPTCRVPLARAPDVTYGKKEVTLRLHPDHPEEWVDKFSERIIPVTEEGIEYQWGNNPPVRL

4kpkA1

0.03

1.84

0.57

EigenThreader

DQQLHYLSCTLGVVLDRSDKHNAFDANNFSAGADGAAFGGALGLICCSAQKALIIHDDDLDAAA

2ftcI

0.15

0.14

4.72

0.30

FFAS-3D

-KNMFAIWRVPAPFKPITRKSVGHRMGGGKGAIDHYVTCEFEEVQGFLDQVAHKLPFAAK----

1zvoC2

0.10

0.06

2.34

1.10

SPARKS-K

----------GSLAKATTAPATTRNTGRGGEEKKKEKEKEEQEERETKTPEC------------

5x4zI

0.38

0.09

2.78

0.76

CNFpred

------------------------------------------------DPTLPRSDKECPECHS

4om9A

0.02

1.39

0.83

DEthreader

NA-LLDLNNSVRISNIESNSV-INIGDKTAYIDIKSGDSIDHKGGDLTTAKFGAMNSLTVKNKT

6fb3A

0.06

2.69

0.87

MapAlign

FADGKVWSYTYLEKSMVLLLQSQRQYIFEYDSSDRLHAVTMPSMSTHTSVGYIRNIYNPPESNA

2nbiA

0.25

7.73

0.65

MUSTER

FTPSPDGSPPISPTMLPTNQPTPPEPSSAPSDCGEVIEE-CPLDTCFLPTSDPARPPDCTAVGR

1qypA

0.35

0.12

3.73

0.64

HHsearch

-------------------------------------GSHMEQ----DLKTLPTTKITCPKCGN

6vyvE

0.02

1.42

0.57

CEthreader

EAPDGMLKIQVSAQIGLDKAGTHAHTKIRYMAGHDVQESKRDSLRVYTSAACSIHGTMGHFIVA

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5796

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6kunA	0.43	3.78	0.058	0.797	model1_6kunA.pdb.gz
2	3on7A	0.43	3.55	0.000	0.812	model1_3on7A.pdb.gz
3	3emrA	0.43	3.79	0.078	0.797	model1_3emrA.pdb.gz
4	2wkeA	0.42	4.09	0.069	0.875	model1_2wkeA.pdb.gz
5	2fhxA	0.42	3.87	0.051	0.859	model1_2fhxA.pdb.gz
6	6cbaA	0.42	3.60	0.038	0.812	model1_6cbaA.pdb.gz
7	4xaaA	0.42	3.62	0.080	0.781	model1_4xaaA.pdb.gz
8	2a1xA	0.39	3.69	0.040	0.703	model1_2a1xA.pdb.gz
9	2yntA	0.37	3.31	0.000	0.688	model1_2yntA.pdb.gz
10	3aj0A	0.36	3.99	0.073	0.781	model1_3aj0A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.82	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.82	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0000166	0.78	nucleotide binding
GO:0003676	0.75	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003677	0.73	DNA binding
GO:0043565	0.72	sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:0003700	0.72	transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:0042803	0.71	protein homodimerization activity
GO:0019901	0.71	protein kinase binding
GO:0010428	0.71	methyl-CpNpG binding
GO:0008327	0.71	methyl-CpG binding
GO:0001227	0.71	transcriptional repressor activity, RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific binding
GO:0000977	0.71	RNA polymerase II regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	1.00	biological regulation
GO:0050896	1.00	response to stimulus
GO:0009987	1.00	cellular process
GO:0050794	0.89	regulation of cellular process
GO:0080090	0.85	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.85	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0031323	0.85	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0048523	0.84	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0006355	0.84	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0006974	0.83	cellular response to DNA damage stimulus
GO:0000122	0.83	negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.99	cell part
GO:0044424	0.96	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.90	organelle
GO:0043227	0.89	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043229	0.80	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.78	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.77	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2vgkD	0.399	4.12	0.085	0.875	3.4.16.4	25,49
2	0.060	3etcB	0.383	4.30	0.033	0.781	6.2.1.-	NA
3	0.060	2ywdA	0.382	3.89	0.055	0.828	2.6.-.-	NA
4	0.060	2ouiD	0.383	3.80	0.082	0.781	1.1.1.2	4,6
5	0.060	1qdlB	0.381	4.19	0.000	0.828	4.1.3.27	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	3h0lA	0.396	3.81	0.016	0.797	0.20	ASN	complex1.pdb.gz	34,35,36
2	0.01	2j9pB	0.404	4.27	0.085	0.891	0.12	REZ	complex2.pdb.gz	11,55,56,57
3	0.01	2y4aD	0.423	3.41	0.057	0.812	0.24	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	22,26,27,28,39
4	0.01	1ysb0	0.417	3.29	0.063	0.750	0.14	III	complex4.pdb.gz	21,27,30,31,34,55,56
5	0.01	3hunA	0.362	3.94	0.020	0.750	0.21	ZZ7	complex5.pdb.gz	26,30,31,32,46
6	0.01	1uaqA	0.297	3.68	0.019	0.578	0.38	DUC	complex6.pdb.gz	28,37,41
7	0.01	3h0rA	0.332	4.33	0.016	0.781	0.17	ASN	complex7.pdb.gz	7,8,24,26
8	0.01	2j9pA	0.401	3.97	0.070	0.844	0.17	REZ	complex8.pdb.gz	9,25,26,27,29
9	0.01	3humB	0.399	3.51	0.038	0.797	0.24	CEW	complex9.pdb.gz	14,15,27,36
10	0.01	1p6oB	0.417	3.33	0.063	0.750	0.31	HPY	complex10.pdb.gz	14,15,41

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.