D-I-TASSER Q9UKF5

D-I-TASSER results for Q9UKF5

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q9UKF5
Protein Name: Disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 29
Gene Name: ADAM29

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9UKF5 (820 residues)
MKMLLLLHCLGVFLSCSGHIQDEHPQYHSPPDVVIPVRITGTTRGMTPPGWLSYILPFGG
QKHIIHIKVKKLLFSKHLPVFTYTDQGAILEDQPFVQNNCYYHGYVEGDPESLVSLSTCF
GGFQGILQINDFAYEIKPLAFSTTFEHLVYKMDSEEKQFSTMRSGFMQNEITCRMEFEEI
DNSTQKQSSYVGWWIHFRIVEIVVVIDNYLYIRYERNDSKLLEDLYVIVNIVDSILDVIG
VKVLLFGLEIWTNKNLIVVDDVRKSVHLYCKWKSENITPRMQHDTSHLFTTLGLRGLSGI
GAFRGMCTPHRSCAIVTFMNKTLGTFSIAVAHHLGHNLGMNHDEDTCRCSQPRCIMHEGN
PPITKFSNCSYGDFWEYTVERTKCLLETVHTKDIFNVKRCGNGVVEEGEECDCGPLKHCA
KDPCCLSNCTLTDGSTCAFGLCCKDCKFLPSGKVCRKEVNECDLPEWCNGTSHKCPDDFY
VEDGIPCKERGYCYEKSCHDRNEQCRRIFGAGANTASETCYKELNTLGDRVGHCGIKNAT
YIKCNISDVQCGRIQCENVTEIPNMSDHTTVHWARFNDIMCWSTDYHLGMKGPDIGEVKD
GTECGIDHICIHRHCVHITILNSNCSPAFCNKRGICNNKHHCHCNYLWDPPNCLIKGYGG
SVDSGPPPKRKKKKKFCYLCILLLIVLFILLCCLYRLCKKSKPIKKQQDVQTPSAKEEEK
IQRRPHELPPQSQPWVMPSQSQPPVTPSQSHPQVMPSQSQPPVTPSQSQPRVMPSQSQPP
VMPSQSHPQLTPSQSQPPVTPSQRQPQLMPSQSQPPVTPS

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q9UKF5-D1	1-71,99-153	126		MKMLLLLHCLGVFLSCSGHIQDEHPQYHSPPDVVIPVRITGTTRGMTPPGWLSYILPFGGQKHIIHIKVKKNCYYHGYVEGDPESLVSLSTCFGGFQGILQINDFAYEIKPLAFSTTFEHLVYKMD
2	Q9UKF5-D2	72-98,154-396	270		LLFSKHLPVFTYTDQGAILEDQPFVQNSEEKQFSTMRSGFMQNEITCRMEFEEIDNSTQKQSSYVGWWIHFRIVEIVVVIDNYLYIRYERNDSKLLEDLYVIVNIVDSILDVIGVKVLLFGLEIWTNKNLIVVDDVRKSVHLYCKWKSENITPRMQHDTSHLFTTLGLRGLSGIGAFRGMCTPHRSCAIVTFMNKTLGTFSIAVAHHLGHNLGMNHDEDTCRCSQPRCIMHEGNPPITKFSNCSYGDFWEYTVERTKCLLETVHTKDIFN
3	Q9UKF5-D3	397-820	424		VKRCGNGVVEEGEECDCGPLKHCAKDPCCLSNCTLTDGSTCAFGLCCKDCKFLPSGKVCRKEVNECDLPEWCNGTSHKCPDDFYVEDGIPCKERGYCYEKSCHDRNEQCRRIFGAGANTASETCYKELNTLGDRVGHCGIKNATYIKCNISDVQCGRIQCENVTEIPNMSDHTTVHWARFNDIMCWSTDYHLGMKGPDIGEVKDGTECGIDHICIHRHCVHITILNSNCSPAFCNKRGICNNKHHCHCNYLWDPPNCLIKGYGGSVDSGPPPKRKKKKKFCYLCILLLIVLFILLCCLYRLCKKSKPIKKQQDVQTPSAKEEEKIQRRPHELPPQSQPWVMPSQSQPPVTPSQSHPQVMPSQSQPPVTPSQSQPRVMPSQSQPPVMPSQSHPQLTPSQSQPPVTPSQRQPQLMPSQSQPPVTPS

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.47

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.