D-I-TASSER Q9Y5G7-D3

D-I-TASSER results for Q9Y5G7-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9Y5G7 (103 residues)
NDNTPMFTQPVYRVSVPENLPVGTPVLAVTATDQDEGVHGEVTYSFVKITEKISQIFCLN
VLTGEISTSANLDYEDSSFYELGVEARDGPGLRDRAKVLITIL

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| NDNTPMFTQPVYRVSVPENLPVGTPVLAVTATDQDEGVHGEVTYSFVKITEKISQIFCLNVLTGEISTSANLDYEDSSFYELGVEARDGPGLRDRAKVLITIL
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSSSSC
Confidence	9969967776689999489999939999999719999865799999328987456279849981999867658645867899999997999821899999989
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| NDNTPMFTQPVYRVSVPENLPVGTPVLAVTATDQDEGVHGEVTYSFVKITEKISQIFCLNVLTGEISTSANLDYEDSSFYELGVEARDGPGLRDRAKVLITIL
Prediction	8634442456405040416144413203030234353530502320353377356334035723203044404444365040302044446344304040426
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSSSSC
NDNTPMFTQPVYRVSVPENLPVGTPVLAVTATDQDEGVHGEVTYSFVKITEKISQIFCLNVLTGEISTSANLDYEDSSFYELGVEARDGPGLRDRAKVLITIL

5k8rA

0.48

13.84

1.50

DEthreader

NDNPPVFTQDMYRVNVAENLPAGSSVLKVMAIDMDEGINAEIIYAFINIGKEVRQLFKLDSKTGELTTIGELDFEERDSYTIGVEAKDGGHHTAYCKVQIDIS

5k8rA3

0.48

13.84

1.87

SPARKS-K

NDNPPVFTQDMYRVNVAENLPAGSSVLKVMAIDMDEGINAEIIYAFINIGKEVRQLFKLDSKTGELTTIGELDFEERDSYTIGVEAKDGGHHTAYCKVQIDIS

4nqqA2

0.41

12.01

0.42

MapAlign

NDNKPKFTQDTFRGSVLEGVMPGTSVMQVTATDEDNTYNGVVAYSIHSQEPKEDLMFTIHKSTGTISVISSLDREKVPEYRLTVQATDMEGSTTTAEAVVQIL

4nqqA2

0.41

12.01

0.28

CEthreader

NDNKPKFTQDTFRGSVLEGVMPGTSVMQVTATDEDDAYNGVVAYSIHSQEPKEDLMFTIHKSTGTISVISSLDREKVPEYRLTVQATDMDGSTTTAEAVVQIL

4zpsA

0.52

15.16

1.44

MUSTER

NDNAPVFDQPVYRVKVLENVAPGTLLLTVRASDPDEGVNGKVTYKFRKINEKQSLLFHLHENTGEMTVAKNLDYEECSLYEMEIQAEDVGALLGRSKVIIMVE

4zi9A2

0.51

14.89

0.83

HHsearch

NDNPPAFTKAEYHVSVPENVPLGTRLLKVNATDPDEGANGRVTYSFHKVDHSVVRKFQLDAYTGELSNKEPLDFEEYKVYPMEIQAQDGAGLMARAKVLVTVL

4zi9A2

0.51

14.89

2.17

FFAS-3D

NDNPPAFTKAEYHVSVPENVPLGTRLLKVNATDPDEGANGRVTYSFHKVDHSVVRKFQLDAYTGELSNKEPLDFEEYKVYPMEIQAQDGAGLMARAKVLVTVL

6e6bA6

0.50

0.49

14.09

0.50

EigenThreader

NDNPPVFSQDIYRVSLPENVYPGTTVLRVVATDQDEGVNSEITFSFSEAGQVT--QFNLDSNTGEITTLHTLDFEEVKEYSLVLEAKDGGGMIAQCTVEIEVL

5k8rA

0.48

13.84

1.65

CNFpred

NDNPPVFTQDMYRVNVAENLPAGSSVLKVMAIDMDEGINAEIIYAFINIGKEVRQLFKLDSKTGELTTIGELDFEERDSYTIGVEAKDGGHHTAYCKVQIDIS

5k8rA3

0.48

13.84

1.50

DEthreader

NDNPPVFTQDMYRVNVAENLPAGSSVLKVMAIDMDEGINAEIIYAFINIGKEVRQLFKLDSKTGELTTIGELDFEERDSYTIGVEAKDGGHHTAYCKVQIDIS

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.9482

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5t9tA4	0.98	0.57	0.485	1.000	model1_5t9tA4.pdb.gz
2	5k8rA	0.98	0.59	0.476	1.000	model1_5k8rA.pdb.gz
3	6bx7A3	0.97	0.71	0.350	1.000	model1_6bx7A3.pdb.gz
4	4zpmA2	0.97	0.71	0.427	1.000	model1_4zpmA2.pdb.gz
5	4zplA2	0.96	0.75	0.398	1.000	model1_4zplA2.pdb.gz
6	5sznA3	0.96	0.91	0.524	1.000	model1_5sznA3.pdb.gz
7	6vftA3	0.96	0.77	0.417	1.000	model1_6vftA3.pdb.gz
8	5dzvA	0.96	0.77	0.398	1.000	model1_5dzvA.pdb.gz
9	6vg4A	0.96	0.79	0.485	1.000	model1_6vg4A.pdb.gz
10	5iu9A	0.95	0.87	0.408	1.000	model1_5iu9A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0043169	0.81	cation binding
GO:0046872	0.80	metal ion binding
GO:0005509	0.78	calcium ion binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.88	single-organism process
GO:0007155	0.84	cell adhesion
GO:0098609	0.80	cell-cell adhesion
GO:0098742	0.76	cell-cell adhesion via plasma-membrane adhesion molecules
GO:0009987	0.72	cellular process
GO:0007156	0.71	homophilic cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules
GO:0032502	0.66	developmental process
GO:0065007	0.63	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.62	regulation of biological process
GO:0044763	0.62	single-organism cellular process
GO:0050794	0.61	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044767	0.58	single-organism developmental process
GO:0032501	0.53	multicellular organismal process
GO:0048856	0.52	anatomical structure development

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0031224	1.00	intrinsic component of membrane
GO:0005886	1.00	plasma membrane
GO:0044424	0.68	intracellular part
GO:0016021	0.62	integral component of membrane
GO:0043226	0.61	organelle
GO:0043227	0.56	membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.162	2kpnA	0.569	2.52	0.187	0.728	3.4.24.28	NA
2	0.067	2bk8A	0.616	2.96	0.034	0.854	2.7.11.1	22,66
3	0.067	2rq8A	0.576	2.97	0.108	0.796	2.7.11.1	58,66,81
4	0.067	2cknA	0.534	3.78	0.059	0.825	2.7.10.1	47
5	0.067	2edwA	0.573	3.05	0.155	0.796	2.7.11.1	26,65,81,84,95

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.23	1edhA	0.875	1.61	0.402	0.990	0.98	CA	complex1.pdb.gz	1,3,33,35,39,88
2	0.08	2omy1	0.775	1.78	0.232	0.893	0.99	III	complex2.pdb.gz	22,23,24,28,30,32,56,65,69,70,96
3	0.03	1usqF	0.551	3.23	0.093	0.816	0.94	CLM	complex3.pdb.gz	25,27,28,63,65,66,67
4	0.02	1usqA	0.553	2.90	0.094	0.796	0.83	CLM	complex4.pdb.gz	24,25,65,67,68,69

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.