StarFunc result for job id A0A286YEX9

User Input

>input (47 residues)
MGCCGCGGCGGRCSGGCGGGCGGGCGGGCGGGCGGCGGGCGSYTTCR

Proteins with similar structure

Top structural analogs (as identified by Foldseek and TM-align)

Click to view	Rank	Structure template	TM-score1	TM-score2	Foldseek E-value	Length	ID1	ID2	Download	Description

(a)	The query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using a backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on E-value of Foldseek alignment.
(c)	TM-score1 and ID1 are TM-score and sequence identity normalized by query sequence length.
(d)	TM-score2 and ID2 are TM-score and sequence identity normalized by template sequence length.

Proteins with similar sequence

Top sequence homologs in UniProt

Rank	Template	E-value	Bit-score	Length	ID1	ID2	Description
1	Q9ZQ47	1.76e-05	41.2	819	0.426	0.024	GRDP1_ARATH Glycine-rich domain-containing protein 1 OS=Arabidopsis thaliana OX=3702 GN=GRDP1 PE=2 SV=1
2	Q6IFZ5	1.5	27.3	581	0.362	0.029	Q6IFZ5_RAT Keratin 76 OS=Rattus norvegicus OX=10116 GN=Krt76 PE=2 SV=1
3	P16827	1.6	27.3	873	0.319	0.017	HEPA_HCMVA DNA helicase/primase complex-associated protein OS=Human cytomegalovirus (strain AD169) OX=10360 GN=UL102 PE=2 SV=2
4	Q9NSB2	5.6	25.8	600	0.298	0.023	KRT84_HUMAN Keratin, type II cuticular Hb4 OS=Homo sapiens OX=9606 GN=KRT84 PE=2 SV=2

(a)	Ranking of proteins is based on the E-value of a BLASTp alignment.
(b)	ID1 and ID2 are sequence identities normalized by the query and template sequence lengths, respectively.

Pfam families

Top Pfam family matches

Rank	Pfam family	E-value	Score	Description

(a)	Ranking of Pfam families is based on the E-value provided by HMMsearch.

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) partners

Top PPI partners to 90675.XP_010429194.1

Rank	PPI partner	STRING score	Description
1	90675.XP_010433967.1	0.669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
2	90675.XP_010439258.1	0.669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
3	90675.XP_010448805.1	0.669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
4	90675.XP_010459440.1	0.580	Uncharacterized protein LOC104740519
5	90675.XP_010477002.1	0.580	Uncharacterized protein LOC104756161
6	90675.XP_010413868.1	0.577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
7	90675.XP_010457494.1	0.577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
8	90675.XP_010473856.1	0.577	Uncharacterized protein LOC104753280
9	90675.XP_010475105.1	0.577	Uncharacterized protein LOC104754584
10	90675.XP_010483847.1	0.577	Uncharacterized protein LOC104762277
11	90675.XP_010501312.1	0.577	Uncharacterized protein LOC104778556
12	90675.XP_010509891.1	0.577	Uncharacterized protein LOC104786228 isoform X1
13	90675.XP_010444822.1	0.573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
14	90675.XP_010484672.1	0.573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
15	90675.XP_010422766.1	0.564	Uncharacterized protein LOC104707994 isoform X1
16	90675.XP_010427803.1	0.564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
17	90675.XP_010456212.1	0.564	Uncharacterized protein LOC104737674
18	90675.XP_010457128.1	0.564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
19	90675.XP_010474740.1	0.564	Uncharacterized protein LOC104754289
20	90675.XP_010480300.1	0.564	Uncharacterized protein LOC104759019

A higher STRING score indicates a greater likelihood of interaction.
The query and PPI partners are shown as grey oval and white rectangles, respectively.
Interactions between query and PPI partners are shown by solid black lines. Interactions among PPI partners are by dashed grey lines.
Values in the rectangles are the STRING scores between query and each corresponding PPI partner

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

GO term	C-score	Name
GO:0003674	1.000	molecular_function
GO:0005488	0.989	binding
GO:0005198	0.340	structural molecule activity

C-score is the confidence score of a predicted GO term. Its value ranges from (0,1], where a higher value indicates a higher confidence prediction.
If a child GO term and its parent term have the same C-score, only the child term is shown in this table.

The graph shows the predicted terms for the Molecular Function (MF) GO aspect. GO terms shown in the table are colored by C-score in the graph:

[0.3,0.4)

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

GO term	C-score	Name
GO:0008150	1.000	biological_process
GO:0032502	0.974	developmental process
GO:0009987	0.736	cellular process
GO:0048856	0.623	anatomical structure development
GO:0006996	0.559	organelle organization
GO:0035082	0.355	axoneme assembly
GO:0003341	0.300	cilium movement

C-score is the confidence score of a predicted GO term. Its value ranges from (0,1], where a higher value indicates a higher confidence prediction.
If a child GO term and its parent term have the same C-score, only the child term is shown in this table.

The graph shows the predicted terms for the Biological Process (BP) GO aspect. GO terms shown in the table are colored by C-score in the graph:

[0.3,0.4)

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

GO term	C-score	Name
GO:0110165	1.000	cellular anatomical entity
GO:0005575	1.000	cellular_component
GO:0005622	0.888	intracellular anatomical structure
GO:0005737	0.699	cytoplasm

C-score is the confidence score of a predicted GO term. Its value ranges from (0,1], where a higher value indicates a higher confidence prediction.
If a child GO term and its parent term have the same C-score, only the child term is shown in this table.

The graph shows the predicted terms for the Cellular Component (CC) GO aspect. GO terms shown in the table are colored by C-score in the graph:

[0.3,0.4)

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted reactions (EC numbers and Rhea reactions)

Reaction	C-score	Name

[back to server]